Should he have gotten any money?

[R13]

(MIAMI) ? Concluding a jury was moved by emotion rather than hard evidence, a judge on Wednesday reduced $300 million in damages awarded to a Florida smoker against Philip Morris USA to nearly $39 million.

Broward Circuit Judge Jeffrey Streitfeld ruled jurors in November granted 61-year-old Cindy Naugle a "grossly excessive" amount of punitive and non-economic damages. Naugle, a longtime Benson & Hedges smoker, has advanced emphysema, cannot breath without an oxygen bottle and needs a lung transplant, according to trial testimony. (See how to prevent illness at any age.)

The $300 million had been the highest damage award so far among thousands of lawsuits filed by Florida smokers against tobacco companies. Streitfeld said he is convinced jurors were unduly swayed by Naugle's poor health and what he called Philip Morris' trial strategy of attacking the smoker while refusing to admit past wrongdoing.

"I must conclude the jury was moved by passions ? sympathy for Cindy's suffering and anger towards (Philip Morris') conduct and strategy," Streitfeld said in his order lowering the total to $38.9 million.

Under Florida law, Naugle ? the sister of former Fort Lauderdale Mayor Jim Naugle ? can accept the reduced award or opt for a new trial on the damages award issue. But her attorney, Robert Kelley, said he will try to get a state appeals court to reverse Streitfeld's decision.

"I don't understand why he would set aside the hard work and effort this jury put in," Kelley said. "Why should we accept it?"

Richmond, Va.-based Philip Morris also intends to appeal the lower damage award, said Murray Garnick, associate general counsel and senior vice president at Philip Morris parent Altria Group Inc.

"We will seek further review of today's ruling and any monetary award because we believe that no damages are warranted in this case," Garnick said in a statement.

Trials are taking place across Florida in the roughly 8,000 pending lawsuits filed by smokers or their survivors blaming tobacco companies for serious health problems and deaths. So far, smokers have won eight cases and tobacco companies two.

The lawsuits were filed after the Florida Supreme Court in 2006 threw out a $145 billion class-action jury award for all Florida smokers, by far the highest punitive damage award in U.S. history. The court said each smoker's case had to be decided individually, but smoker's don't have to individually prove key findings of the original jury: that tobacco companies knowingly sold dangerous products and hid smoking risks from the public.

Garnick said tobacco firms continue to challenge that ruling as "fundamentally unfair and unconstitutional," arguing each case should stand or fall on its own merits. A federal appeals court is considering whether Florida smoker cases pending in federal courts should allow the original jury's findings about tobacco companies or make each trial start from scratch.

Read more: Judge Cuts $300M Smoker's Lawsuit Award to $39M - TIME

[cosmo99]

Seriously, How could you not know that smoking is bad for you. I know smoking is bad for me and even though I know that I still smoke. It is no one's fault but my own. This is crazy to blame a company for your health problems when you know that it was your personal decision that made you have the health problems to begin with. That is like suing McDonald's for being overweight. (I think that happened didn't it?)

[imported_elp6n]

I'm about as anti-smoking as they come, but I can't say I agree with awarding individual smokers cash settlements.

This individual is 61 years old.
Warnings on cigarette packs were mandated in 1970 I believe. So this individual was 21 when the warnings were mandated. This individual had the option to quit (yes - very difficult and easier said than done - but it can be done), but they didn't.

Additionally, if one is diagnosed with Emphysema in its early stage, the lungs can heal and reverse the damage if the individual quits smoking. A large percentage of emphysema sufferers are diagnosed very early, before it becomes a debilitating disease. A simple xray can diagnose it in very early stage, often found during treatment for pneumonia, respitory infections, or other conditions when a chest xray is ordered.

I do feel tobacco companies operated in devious fashion in their formulations and advertising, but people were also made aware of the dangers long ago.

[Biggin]

its ridiculous, and IM A SMOKER!!

this might have been fine 25 years ago, when the risks were not as well known, but now, its just wrong. the guy is obviously lying, it says the risks on the cigarettes.